Holding back the GMO tide

| March 20, 2014 | 3 Comments

http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-photo-gentecially-modified-organism-warning-sign-vector-illustration-image37747235Almost a thousand years ago King Canute had his throne placed on an English beach and commanded the advancing tide to retreat in order to demonstrate to his sycophantic courtiers how ultimately powerless he was in the face of nature. I was strongly reminded of this story when reading about the results of a recent survey by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). This concerned reported incidents of low-level GMO contamination in food and feed shipments and found no less than 193 recorded between 2002 and 2012. Significantly, 138 of those occurred in the last three years of that period, almost certainly a consequence of increasing GM crop cultivation around the world and of more countries testing for GMOs in the food shipments arriving at their borders.

In countries where GM crops are grown widely, such as the USA, China, Canada and Brazil, production has been increasing rapidly as more and more land is devoted to GMO cultivation. Meanwhile, in Europe especially, we remain largely opposed to GM crops and to GMO contamination in the foods we eat. This resistance to a technology that many see as the solution to feeding a growing population in the future perhaps has more to do with the very idea of GM crops rather than any conclusively proven food safety problems. But even without going into the arguments for and against GM foods, it presents European countries with a serious practical problem. As more and more food commodities include a significant proportion of GM varieties, how can they continue to exclude them from the food supply?

We hear an awful lot about the global nature of the modern food industry and how its supply chains now extend across continents, and for many food commodities that is indeed the case. If European consumers want cheap food that is available all year round, then much of it has to be imported from far away places. For instance, the FAO survey found that one of the most likely foods to contain traces of GMOs was rice. We eat a lot of rice here in the UK, but even with the effects of global warming very little of it is ever going to be produced within our own borders. As much of the rest of the world enthusiastically embraces the apparent benefits of GM crops, trying to keep them out of Europe will likely become as futile as Canute’s attempt to control the sea.

Tags: , , ,

Category: Blog

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Padraig says:

    Even if all food became GMOed, it still wouldn’t be the end completely. By that stage the outlook would be very bleak, might be huge increases in cancers, natural food could potentially be wiped out, but some humans might still exist.

    The goal then would in many ways be the same: try to get food as close to the natural form as possible and with as little GMO as possible in them. The human descendants doing this would curse us for making natural food extinct forever, or messing up the ecosystem so badly that it no longer grows, for all the increasing cancers and other horrible diseases. However it wouldn’t be the absolute END, there would be something left.

    • Richard Lawley says:

      I can’t share your rather apocalyptic view of GM crops and their likely effect on humankind Padraig, although I’m glad you can see some light at the end of the tunnel. I like to think that GM crops have the potential to help solve an impending crisis in our food supply if they are managed and regulated carefully with the emphasis on the benefits for consumers rather than big profits for biotech businesses. History suggests that it’s usually better to make new technology work for us rather than to try and cram the genie back in the bottle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *